Search for: All records

Abstract Utilizing 956 nights of Na lidar nocturnal mesopause region temperature profiles acquired at Fort Collins, CO (40.6°N, 105.1°W) over a 20‐year period (March 1990–2010), we deduce background nightly mean temperatureand the square of the buoyancy frequencyN²(z) at 2‐km resolution between 83 and 105 km. The temperature climatology reveals the two‐level mesopause structure with clarity and sharp mesopause transitions, resulting in 102 days of summer from Days 121 to 222 of the year. The same data set analyzed at 10‐min and 1‐km resolution gives the gravity wave (GW) temperature perturbationsT_i'(z) and the wave varianceVar(T′(z)) and GW potential energyE_pm(z) between 85 and 100 km. Seasonal averages of GWVar(T′(z)) andE_pm(z) between 90 and 100 km, show thatVar(T′) for spring and autumn are comparable and lower than for summer and winter. Due mainly to the higher background stability, or largerN²(z) in summer,E_pm(z) between 85 and 100 km is comparable in spring, summer, and autumn seasons, but ∼30%–45% smaller than the winter values at the same altitude. The uncertainties are about 4% for winter and about 5% for the other three seasons. The values forE_pmare (156.0, 176.2, 145.6, and 186.2 J/kg) at 85 km for (spring, summer, autumn, and winter) respectively, (125.4, 120.2, 115.2, and 168.7 J/kg) at 93 km, and (207.5, 180.5, 213.1, and 278.6 J/kg) at 100 km. Going up in altitude, all profiles first decrease and then increase, suggesting that climatologically, GWs break below 85 km. 

Abstract We present midlatitude solar response and linear trend from Colorado State University/Utah State University Na lidar nocturnal temperature observations between 1990 and 2017. Along with the nightly mean temperatures (_Ngt), we also use the corresponding 2‐hr means centered at midnight (_2MN), resulting in vertical trend profiles similar in shapes as those previously published. The 28‐year trend from _Ngt (_2MN) data set starts from a small warming at 85 km, to cooling at 87 (88) km, reaching a maximum of 1.85 ± 0.53 (1.09 ± 0.74) at 92 (93) km and turns positive again at 102 (100) km. The 6‐month winter trend is much cooler than the 4‐month summer trend with comparable solar response varying around 5 ± 1 K/100 SFU throughout the profile (85–105 km) with higher summer values. We explore the observed summer/winter trend difference in terms of observed gravity wave heat flux heating rate at a nearby station and the long‐term trend of gravity wave variance at a midlatitude. Between 89 and 100 km, the lidar trends are within the error bars of the Leibniz Middle Atmosphere (LIMA) summer trends (1979–2013), which are nearly identical to the lidar‐Ngt trend. We address the need of long data set for reliable analysis on trend, the extent of trend uncertainty due to possible tidal bias, the effect of a Pinatubo/episodic function, and the impact of stratospheric ozone recovery.